N. Molders et al., SOME EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT CLOUD PARAMETERIZATIONS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL AND A CHEMISTRY TRANSPORT MODEL, Journal of applied meteorology, 33(4), 1994, pp. 527-545
Chemistry transport models often ignore the cloud parameters that can
be provided by meteorological preprocessors like mesoscale meteorologi
cal models. They often recalculate these parameters with algorithms th
at differ from those used in the meteorological preprocessors. Hence,
inconsistencies can occur between the treatment of clouds in the meteo
rological and chemical part of the model package. In this study the in
fluence of five different cloud parameterization schemes used in a wel
l-known mesoscale meteorological model on the results of a stand-alone
version of a cloud and scavenging module is illustrated. The differen
ces between the results provided by five model runs with different clo
ud modules and those recalculated by the stand-alone version are discu
ssed. Such differences occur due to the inconsistencies between the di
fferent cloud parameterization schemes in the meteorological model and
the cloud and scavenging module. The results of the cloud and scaveng
ing module differ due to the different meteorological input data provi
ded by the meteorological model. It is manifested both in recalculated
cloud parameters and in predicted wet deposition rates. As illustrate
d in this study, the rate of wet deposition strongly depends on the cl
oud parameterization scheme used in the meteorological model and, henc
e, on the model architecture itself.