BSAP can repress enhancer activity by targeting PU.1 function

Citation
S. Maitra et M. Atchison, BSAP can repress enhancer activity by targeting PU.1 function, MOL CELL B, 20(6), 2000, pp. 1911-1922
Citations number
74
Categorie Soggetti
Molecular Biology & Genetics
Journal title
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
02707306 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1911 - 1922
Database
ISI
SICI code
0270-7306(200003)20:6<1911:BCREAB>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
PU.1 and BSAP are transcription factors crucial for proper B-cell developme nt. Absence of PU.1 results in loss of B, T, and myeloid cells, while absen ce of BSAP results in an early block in B-cell differentiation. Both of the se proteins bind to the immunoglobulin kappa chain 3' enhancer, which is de velopmentally regulated during B-cell differentiation. We find here that BS AP can repress 3' enhancer activity. This repression can occur in plasmacyt oma lines or in a non-B-cell line in which the enhancer is activated by add ition of the appropriate enhancer binding transcription factors. We show th at the transcription factor PU.1 is a target of the BSAP-mediated repressio n. Although PU.1 and BSAP can physically interact through their respective DNA binding domains, this interaction does not affect DNA binding. When PU. 1 function is assayed in isolation on a multimerized PU.1 binding site, BSA P targets a portion of the PU.1 transactivation domain (residues 7 to 30) f or repression. The BSAP inhibitory domain (residues 358 to 385) is needed f or this repression. Interestingly, the coactivator protein p300 can elimina te this BSAP-mediated repression. We also show that PU.1 can inhibit BSAP t ransactivation and that this repression requires PU.1 amino acids 7 to 30. Transfection of p300 resulted in only a partial reversal of PU.1-mediated r epression of BSAP. When PU.1 function is assayed in the context of the immu noglobulin kappa chain 3' enhancer and associated binding proteins, BSAP re presses PU.1 function by a distinct mechanism. This repression does not req uire the PU.1 transactivation or PEST domains and cannot be reversed by p30 0 expression. The possible roles of BSAP and PU.1 antagonistic activities i n hematopoietic development are discussed.