Patterns of outcome measurement in Parkinson's disease clinical trials

Citation
Sl. Mitchell et al., Patterns of outcome measurement in Parkinson's disease clinical trials, NEUROEPIDEM, 19(2), 2000, pp. 100-108
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
02515350 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
100 - 108
Database
ISI
SICI code
0251-5350(200003/04)19:2<100:POOMIP>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
The study examines the pattern of use and clinimetric properties of clinica l endpoints used in randomized trials for Parkinson's disease (PD). Randomi zed drug trials for PD were identified through a Medline search conducted f rom January 1966 until August 1998. The endpoints used in these trials were abstracted. Reports examining the clinimetric properties of the disease-sp ecific scales used in these trials were also abstracted. Data regarding the consistency, accuracy, discrimination and feasibility of scales used in at least 10% of trials were determined. One hundred and thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria; 70.8% of trials used some clinical scale for P D as an endpoint. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) was the most commonly used scale (32.8%). Factors independently associated with the use of the UPDRS included: the study location in the US, mean age of s ubjects over 62.7 years and publication after 1994. The UPDRS was more thor oughly stud led and superior in most clinimetric domains compared to scales developed earlier. Few studies included generic health status (2.9%) or co gnitive measures (16.8%) as secondary endpoints. There have been definite i mprovements in the area of disease-specific measurement in PD trials since the introduction of the UPDRS. The results of studies that used instruments with poor or unreported clinimetric properties should be critically interp reted. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.