Effects of menstrual cycle and urinary tract instrumentation on uroflowmetry

Citation
Ag. Visco et al., Effects of menstrual cycle and urinary tract instrumentation on uroflowmetry, NEUROUROL U, 19(2), 2000, pp. 147-152
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS
ISSN journal
07332467 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
147 - 152
Database
ISI
SICI code
0733-2467(2000)19:2<147:EOMCAU>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
We sought to compare bladder emptying function in normal women during the p roliferative and secretory phases of the menstrual cycle and to evaluate wh ether urethral catheterization affected uroflowmetry parameters. Forty-nine normal volunteers (ages 19-42 years) were recruited and underwent uroflowm etry in the proliferative and secretory phases of the menstrual cycle. A se rum progesterone level of <3.0 ng/mL defined the proliferative phase. Durin g the proliferative phase, volunteers underwent uroflowmetry analysis when a sensation of fullness was appreciated. A post-void residual volume was de termined, and the bladder was filled with 400 mt of normal saline. Repeat u roflowmetry analysis was then performed. This two-step procedure was repeat ed at a separate visit during the secretory phase. Voided volume, residual volume, maximum and average flow rates, time-to-maximum flow, and duration of flow were recorded. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical analysis. A two-tailed a value of <0.05 defined statistical significance. Our analysis was limited to the 33 patients whose predicted menstrual datin g correlated with the obtained progesterone levels. During the follicular p hase, we found significantly faster maximum (P < 0.0001) and average flow r ates (P = 0.01), along with a shorter time-to-maximum flow (P < 0.0001) and shorter duration of flow (P < 0.0001), during the pre-catheterized void th an the post-catheterized void. Similar results were observed in the secreto ry phase with the exception of a slightly higher residual volume (P = 0.05) . No difference was seen in any measured uroflowmetry parameter when compar ing similar voids between phases of the menstrual cycle. We conclude that w hen evaluating pre-menopausal patients, uroflowmetry may be scheduled and p erformed during either phase of the menstrual cycle. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, I nc.