Objective: To determine the association between advanced pelvic organ prola
pse and changes in lumbar lordosis and/or pelvic inlet orientation.
Methods: Lateral lumbosacral spine/pelvic x-rays were taken of women with g
rade 2 or greater uterovaginal prolapse and women with grade 1 or less prol
apse standing in their usual upright posture. The angles of lumbar lordosis
and the pelvic inlet were measured by a radiologist who was masked to the
pelvic examination findings.
Results: Twenty women with prolapse were matched with 20 women without sign
ificant prolapse. There were no significant differences in the mean (+/- st
andard deviation [SD]) age (55.3 +/- 9.0 years compared with 53.4 +/- 9.5 y
ears), body mass index (BMI) (28.9 +/- 5.6 compared with 28.4 +/- 5.2), gra
vidity (5.6 +/- 3.5 compared with 5.0 +/- 2.7), and vaginal parity (4.65 +/
- 3.3 compared with 4.5 +/- 2.9) between the prolapse and nonprolapse group
s, respectively. All participants were vaginally parous. The mean lumbar lo
rdotic angle in women with pelvic organ prolapse (32.0 degrees +/- 9.8 degr
ees) was significantly lower than that of controls (42.4 degrees +/- 10.9 d
egrees) (P < .003). The mean angle of the pelvic inlet in women with pelvic
organ prolapse (37.5 degrees +/- 7.0 degrees) was significantly larger tha
n that of controls (29.5 degrees +/- 7.3 degrees) (P < .001). The differenc
es in the mean angles of lumbar lordosis and the pelvic inlet, between the
case and control groups, remained significant after multivariable logistic
regression was performed.
Conclusion: Women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse have less lumbar lord
osis and a pelvic inlet that is oriented less vertically than women without
prolapse. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:332-6. (C) 2000 by The American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).