Objective: This study was conducted to determine whether breech-presenting
infants have a different pattern of early neuromotor development than cepha
lic-presenting infants-regardless of mode of delivery-thus explaining both
the failure to assume cephalic version at the end of gestation and the high
er rates of childhood motor impairments associated with breech presentation
.
Methods: Ninety morphologically normal, term, breech-presenting singletons
with birthweights greater than 2500 g were paired with a similar cephalic-p
resenting infant, matched for gender and mode of delivery (n = 180; 100 del
ivered abdominally anti 80 delivered vaginally). Data on neurological statu
s (Neurological Assessment of the Preterm and Full-term Newborn Infant) and
motor performance (Alberta Infant Motor Scale, Peabody Developmental Motor
Scales, and age of walking) were collected prospectively over the first 18
months of life. This study was designed with a power of .80 to detect a "m
edium" effect size for motor development using the Alberta Infant Motor Sca
le. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance techniques.
Results: Breech-presenting infants had minor transient differences compared
with cephalic-presenting infants. First, they had more open popliteal angl
es at birth (P <.001). Second, they had significantly lower motor scores at
6 weeks than the normative sample (P <.001). At 18 months, three infants w
ere diagnosed with neurological problems, all of whom were delivered electi
vely in the cesarean-breech group.
Conclusion: As a group, breech-presenting infants do not have a persistent,
inherently different pattern of motor development than cephalic-presenting
infants. Mode of delivery did not explain the: excess neuromotor impairmen
t detected in the subgroup of breech infants, (Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:425-3
2. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).