Retest variability of human infant contrast sensitivity: How many tests are sufficient?

Citation
Rj. Adams et al., Retest variability of human infant contrast sensitivity: How many tests are sufficient?, OPT VIS SCI, 77(2), 2000, pp. 90-95
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE
ISSN journal
10405488 → ACNP
Volume
77
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
90 - 95
Database
ISI
SICI code
1040-5488(200002)77:2<90:RVOHIC>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Retest variability of a new infant contrast sensitivity (CS) card procedure was assessed by binocular measurement of a group of 20 6-month-olds twice within a 1-week period. Coefficient of reliability analyses showed that wit hin-subject variability between tests was only slightly less than variation across subjects, which suggests that results from a single test are a poor predictor of an infant's "true" visual functioning. To determine how many tests are needed to estimate when infant CS stabilizes to within an accepta ble (0.15 log unit) criterion, a second experiment was conducted in which a small group of subjects was tested repeatedly over a 2-week period. The re sults showed that averaging performance on 2 to 3 tests was required before an accurate estimate of the subject's performance could be obtained. Our r esults suggest that caution should be taken in the interpretation of a sing le measurement of infant visual functioning.