FUNCTIONAL MEASURES OF FIRST-STROKE REHABILITATION INPATIENTS - USEFULNESS OF THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE TOTAL SCORE WITH A CLINICAL RATIONALE
H. Ring et al., FUNCTIONAL MEASURES OF FIRST-STROKE REHABILITATION INPATIENTS - USEFULNESS OF THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE TOTAL SCORE WITH A CLINICAL RATIONALE, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 78(6), 1997, pp. 630-635
Objective: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was used to measu
re function in first-stroke patients on admission to and discharge fro
m a rehabilitation center, and to determine gain; all data were analyz
ed by a clinically oriented approach. Design: All patients admitted af
ter a first supratentorial stroke to a comprehensive rehabilitation fa
cility over a 2-year period were examined prospectively with the FIM.
Diagnosis was determined by neuroimaging. Data were collected continuo
usly and stored in the departmental database. For analysis of data, th
e patients were divided by side of lesion (right or left hemisphere),
main clinical syndrome (presence or absence of neglect or aphasic synd
romes in those with damage to the right or left hemisphere, respective
ly), type of lesion (ischemic, hemorrhagic, etc), and site of lesion (
cortical or subcortical). Setting: Neurological rehabilitation ward. P
atients: The study population included 151 patients of average age 60.
8 years; 60% were men. All were admitted an average of 28.9 days after
stroke and rehabilitated for 109.3 days. Main Outcome Measure: The ra
w FIM total score was determined at 48 to 72 hours after admission and
at discharge. FIM gain was calculated by subtracting the FIM discharg
e score from the FIM admission score for each individual. Length of st
ay was also recorded. Results: There was no difference in average tota
l FIM scores when patients were divided by side of damage (right or le
ft hemisphere). Significant findings were obtained for the various par
ameters when the clinical criterion was applied. Patients with neglect
or aphasia syndromes showed significantly higher gains despite their
lower FIM admission scores, but they had a much longer in-hospital sta
y. Conclusion: The raw FIM total score is a simple, practical, and eff
icient measure of function in first-stroke patients on admission for r
ehabilitation, provided an appropriate clinical approach is used durin
g data analysis. Results can be used for comparison with similar measu
res, determination of admission and discharge policy, and program eval
uation. The presence of neglect and aphasic syndromes has a significan
t effect on the various measures. Length of stay in rehabilitation is
also of paramount importance in stroke patients with special clinical
syndromes. (C) 1997 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicin
e and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.