Widespread sympathy for patients who have been victims of abuse perpetrated
by predatory psychologists may obscure the possibility that some purported
victims fabricate or distort their claims. Civil courts or licensing board
s might be used by purported victims to further a variety of personal agend
as that involve false claims against psychologists. Anecdotal reports of 6
antecedents of such claims are presented. It is hoped that this discussion
will increase awareness by peers and by those involved with relevant litiga
tion that false, but credible, claims of negligence, predation, and malprac
tice not only are possible but may serve a number of emotional and practica
l needs on the part of the accuser. Psychologists and those who adjudicate
such claims are urged to be wary that the purported victim may be himself o
r herself the predator.