Three experiments compared immediate serial recall of disyllabic words that
differed on spoken duration. Two sets of long- and short-duration words we
re selected, in each case maximizing duration differences bur matching for
frequency; familiarity phonological similarity and number of phonemes, and
controlling for semantic associations. Serial recall measures were obtained
using auditory and visual presentation and spoken and picture-pointing rec
all. In Experiments la and Ib, using the first set of items, long words wer
e better recalled than short words. In Experiments 2a and 2b, using the sec
ond set of items, no difference was found between long and short disyllabic
words. Experiment 3 confirmed the large advantage for short-duration words
in the word set originally selected by Baddeley, Thomson, and Buchanan (19
75). These findings suggest that there is no reliable advantage for short-d
uration disyllables in span tasks, and that previous accounts of a word-len
gth effect in disyllables are based on accidental differences between list
items. The failure to find an effect of word duration casts doubt on theori
es that propose that the capacity of memory span is determined by the durat
ion of list items or the decay rate of phonological information in short-te
rm memory.