Does the response of the intestinal epithelium to keratinocyte growth factor vary according to the method of administration?

Citation
Ra. Goodlad et al., Does the response of the intestinal epithelium to keratinocyte growth factor vary according to the method of administration?, REGUL PEPT, 87(1-3), 2000, pp. 83-90
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
REGULATORY PEPTIDES
ISSN journal
01670115 → ACNP
Volume
87
Issue
1-3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
83 - 90
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-0115(20000208)87:1-3<83:DTROTI>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Background: Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) is a potent mitogen and may be of value for the treatment of conditions such as short bowel syndrome and chemotherapy-induced mucositis. However the most efficacious route and meth od of administration is unclear. Methods: Rats maintained by total parenter al nutrition (TPN) were given KGF (1 mg/kg/rat/day, iv) infused continuousl y or as a once-daily injection. The same dose was also given sc. to chow-fe d rats. Changes in gut growth were assessed by measurement of wet weight, p roliferation (vincristine induced metaphase arrest) and crypt branching ind ex. Changes in gut hormone profile were also determined to examine if any t rophic effects were mediated via this mechanism. Results: KGF caused a 70-1 00% increase in wet weight of the stomach, small and large intestine of TPN -fed rats (P < 0.01) with no significant differences seen between the two m ethods of administration. The increase in metaphase counts was greatest in the stomach (about seven-fold P < 0.01), but was less pronounced in the dis tal small intestine and colon (about 50% increase). The trophic effect of K GF was much less prominent in orally-fed rats. Crypt branching index was si gnificantly reduced by KGF in the proximal small intestine of TPN, but not orally-fed rats. Plasma gastrin, PYY, total glucagon, enteroglucagon and GL P-1 all increased by two-three-fold tall P <0.01) in response to KGF wherea s insulin levels fell by about 25% in the TPN group. Conclusions: The mitog enic action of KGF occurred predominantly in the stomach and proximal small intestine. Its efficacy was less pronounced in orally-fed animals, suggest ing KGF may be of greatest benefit in conditions associated with lowered in testinal proliferation. Clinical trials of KGF can probably use single dail y iv injections without reduction in efficacy. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science BN . All rights reserved.