This Article examines the Supreme Court's treatment of compelled expression
cases. It sets forth the speech restraint framework by describing the cruc
ial determinations guiding judicial analysis. It then explains the current
results, reasoning, and incoherence of the compelled expression cases. This
Article isolates and evaluates the variables that the Court claims are sig
nificant to compelled expression analysis. It then adjusts the variables ac
cording to the free speech clause values evident in speech restraint analys
is to create a coherent doctrine of compelled expression. This doctrine bot
h places past cases within a consistent framework and provides a structure
for evaluating future compelled expression cases.