M. Guba et al., Differential effects of short-term ACE- and AT1-receptor inhibition on postischemic injury and leukocyte adherence in vivo and in vitro, SHOCK, 13(3), 2000, pp. 190-196
There is recent evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitio
n reduces postischemic injury and angiotensin II receptor inhibition may ha
ve similar effects. We therefore further characterized the role of ACE- vs.
AT1-receptor inhibition on cell injury and temporal association of leukocy
te endothelial interaction in response to ischemia-reperfusion. A combined
in vivo and in vitro study comparing the ACE inhibitor enalapril and the AT
1-receptor antagonist losartan was performed. The extent and temporal corre
lation of cellular damage (propidium-iodide staining), microvascular perfus
ion failure and leukocyte-endothelial interaction (leukocyte adherence) wer
e investigated by means of intravital microscopy, after the application of
hemodynamically ineffective doses of enalapril and losartan (5 mg/kg). A ha
mster dorsal skinfold model with a 4-h tourniquet ischemia was used. In vit
ro, the effect of enalapril and losartan on polymorphonuclear cell (PMN) ad
herence, as well as adhesion molecule expression (ICAM-1, VCAM-1), on hypox
ia- or IL-1 beta-stimulated endothelial cells (HUVEC) was assessed using a
PMN-adhesion assay and flow cytometry, respectively. Ischemia-reperfusion r
esponses revealed a biphasic pattern, comprised of an early phase (30 min)
of acute cellular damage and microvascular perfusion failure, followed by a
late increase (240 min) in leukocyte adherence in vivo. Enalapril signific
antly reduced early cellular damage, microvascular perfusion failure, and l
eukocyte adherence in response to ischemia-reperfusion. Conversely AT1 rece
ptor inhibition with losartan proved to be ineffective at attenuating posti
schemic microcirculatory disorders (leukocyte-endothelial interactions, mic
rovascular perfusion failure) and aggravated cellular injury. In vitro, ena
lapril reduced PMN adherence and ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression, while losart
an was ineffective in the same respect. Following ischemia-reperfusion inju
ry; ACE- versus AT1-receptor inhibition induce differential effects concern
ing the extent and temporal association of cell injury and leukocyte-endoth
elial interaction. The use of enalapril combines the beneficial effects of
preventing cell and vascular injury immediately after reperfusion, with a d
elayed inhibition of the inflammatory response. Since the AT1-receptor inhi
bitor losartan did not mimic effects obtained with ACE inhibition, it is co
nceivable that the responses in ischemia-reperfusion are mediated by a non-
angiotensin II-AT1 receptor-dependent mechanism.