Understanding and quantifying the large, unexplained variability in soil er
osion data are critical for advancing erosion science, evaluating soil eros
ion models, and designing erosion experiments, We hypothesized that it is p
ossible to quantify variability between replicated soil erosion field plots
under natural rainfall, and thus determine the principal factor or factors
which correlate to the magnitude of the variability: Data from replicated
plot pairs for 2061 storms, 797 annual erosion measurements, and 53 multi-y
ear erosion totals were used. Thirteen different soil types and site locati
ons were represented in the data. The relative differences between replicat
ed plot pair data tended to be lesser for greater magnitudes of measured so
il loss, thus indicating that soil loss magnitude was a principal factor fo
r explaining variance in the soil loss data. Using this assumption, we esti
mated the coefficient of variation of within-treatment, plot replicate valu
es of measured soil lass. Variances between replicates decreased as a power
function (r(2) = 0.78) of measured soil loss, and were independent of whet
her the measurements were event-, annual-, or multi-year values. Coefficien
ts of variation ranged on the order of 14% for a measured soil loss of 20 k
g/m(2) to greater than 150% for a measured soil loss of less than 0.01 kg/m
(2) These results have important implications for both experimental design
and for using erosion data to evaluate prediction capability for erosion mo
dels.