In 1996 in Stafford, UK, a collision occurred between a freight train and a
post office train. While only one person died, 21 employees working on the
Post office train were injured. Instead of focusing on primary victims, i.
e: those on the train, or secondary victims, i.e. helpers or the significan
t others of the dead and injured, the present paper focused on community re
sidents who lived on both sides of the embankment where the collision occur
red. There were two aims to this paper. We wished to (1) describe the degre
e of traumatic stress of the community residents and (2) describe their tra
umatic responses at the time and during the aftermath of the collision. The
hypothesis was that there was a significant degree of traumatic stress amo
ng these residents and that the greater the impact of the collision they ex
perienced, the more severe their traumatic stress became. Forty-nine reside
nts participated in the study and were assessed using the Impact of Event S
cale (IES), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and the Stafford train c
rash questionnaire. The results showed that among the whole sample, the res
idents experienced more intrusive thoughts than avoidance behaviour, but th
eir scores were significantly lower thai 2 those of the standardized stress
clinic samples. Forty-one per-cent of the residents scored at or above the
cutoff point of the GHQ. Two groups, high symptom and low/medium symptom g
roups, were then divided, according to the cutoff of the IES, and compared.
The results shows that the high symptom group scored significantly higher
in the sub-scales of the IES, and the GHQ. There was indeed a tendency that
the greater the impact of the collision residents experienced, the more se
vere the distress was. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.