Rm. Sharkey et al., ADVANTAGE OF RESIDUALIZING RADIOLABELS FOR AN INTERNALIZING ANTIBODY AGAINST THE B-CELL LYMPHOMA ANTIGEN, CD22, Cancer immunology and immunotherapy, 44(3), 1997, pp. 179-188
LL2 is an anti-CD22 pan-B-cell monoclonal antibody which, when radiola
beled, has a high sensitivity for detecting B-cell, non-Hodgkin's lymp
homa (NHL), as well as an antitumor efficacy in therapeutic applicatio
ns. The aim of this study was to determine whether intracellularly ret
ained radiolabels have an advantage in the diagnosis and therapy of ly
mphoma with LL2. In vitro studies showed that iodinated LL2 is intrace
llularly catabolized, with a rapid release of the radioiodine from the
cell. In contrast, residualizing radiolabels, such as radioactive met
als, are retained intracellularly for substantially longer. In vivo st
udies were performed using LL2-labeled with radioiodine by a non-resid
ualizing (chloramine-T) or a residualizing method (dilactitol-tyramine
, DLT), or with a radioactive metal (In-111). The biodistribution of a
mixture of I-125 (non-residualizing chloramine-T compared to residual
izing DLT), In-111-labeled LL2 murine IgG2a or its fragments [F(ab')(2
), Fab'], as well as its humanized, CDR-grafted form, was studied in n
ude mice bearing the RL human B-cell NHL cell line. Radiation doses we
re calculated from the biodistribution data according to the Medical I
nternational Radiation Dose scheme to assess the potential advantage f
or therapeutic applications. At all assay times, tumor uptake was high
er with the residualizing labels (i.e., In-111 and DLT-I-125) than wit
h the non-residualizing iodine label. For example, tumor/blood ratios
of In-111-labeled IgG were 3.2-, 3.5- and 2.8-fold higher than for non
-residualizing iodinated IgG on days 3, 7 and 14, respectively. Simila
r results were obtained for DLT-labeled IgG and fragments with residua
lized radiolabels. Tumor/organ ratios also were higher with residualiz
ing labels. No significant differences in tumor, blood and organ uptak
e were observed between murine and humanized LL2. The conventionally i
odinated anti-CD20 antibody, 1F5, had tumor uptake values comparable t
o those of iodinated LL2, the uptake of both antibodies being strongly
dependent on tumor size. These data suggest that, with internalizing
antibodies such as LL2, labeling with intracellularly retained isotope
s has an advantage over released ones, which justifies further clinica
l trials with residualizing In-111-labeled LL2 for diagnosis, and resi
dualizing I-131 and Y-90 labels for therapy.