U. Gessner et al., Economic analysis of terminal care for patients with malignant osteolytic bone disease and pain treated with pamidronate, SUPP CARE C, 8(2), 2000, pp. 115-122
The goals of this study were the assessment (1) of all costs of terminal ca
re of patients with osteolytic bone disease and pain and (2) of the economi
c consequences of the pamidronate treatment as observed in a prospective cl
inical trial on the effectiveness of pamidronate. A total of 70 patients we
re recruited, who were all suffering from advanced tumour diseases (60% bre
ast cancer, 21% multiple myeloma, and 19% other tumours). In a single-insti
tution study the patients were randomly assigned to receive, in a double-bl
inded setting, pamidronate 60 mg i.v. or 90 mg i.v. every 3 weeks for a max
imum of six cycles. Perception of pain intensity was recorded by self-asses
sment, using a linear analogue scale. Follow-up lasted 6 months after treat
ment. All elements of direct costs of in-patient and out-patient care were
recorded in cooperation with the hospital administration and the health ins
urance companies [Krankenkassen]. Average monthly direct costs amounted to
ECU 1,290 (+/-410) and 1,050 (+/-430) during the treat ment phase and follo
w-up, respectively. Average in-patient costs were about three times the out
-patient costs. Significantly higher costs (by a factor of 2) were observed
for terminal care in hospital (last 3 months before death) than for contin
ued care (of patients surviving the study period). The treatment with pamid
ronate reduced pain significantly but did not add noticeably to the costs.
The study showed that it is practicable and quite efficient to combine a ph
armaco-economic evaluation with a clinical trial, although it may be diffic
ult (depending on the setting and availability of information) to assess tr
ue costs, i.e. total resource usage.