Comparison of in-phase and out-of-phase gradient recalled echo T1-weightedpulse sequence for MR imaging of malignant liver masses following administration of paramagnetic gadolinium-chelate
J. Petersein et al., Comparison of in-phase and out-of-phase gradient recalled echo T1-weightedpulse sequence for MR imaging of malignant liver masses following administration of paramagnetic gadolinium-chelate, ABDOM IMAG, 25(2), 2000, pp. 159-163
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of in-
phase and out-of-phase gradient recalled echo (GRE) pulse sequences on para
magnetic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of malignant liv
er lesions.
Methods: Fifty patients (27 women, 23 men; mean age 50 +/- 27 years) with k
nown or suspected focal liver lesions, nine of whom had a fatty liver, were
examined at 1.5 T before and 60 min after injection of gadobenate dimeglum
ine at a dose of 0.05 or 0.1 mmol/kg using two GRE techniques: echo time of
2.3 ms (out-of-phase) or 4.6 ms (in-phase). Liver signal-to-noise ratio (S
NR) and lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated.
Results: In patients with a nonfatty liver, liver SNR increased from 26 +/-
9 to 41 +/- 17 on in-phase images and from 28 +/- 8 to 45 +/- 14 on out-of
-phase images. In patients with a fatty liver, in-phase images provided sig
nificantly higher (p < 0.01) liver SNR than did out-of-phase images predose
(34 +/- 8 on in-phase vs. 21 +/- 8 on out-of-phase) and postdose (44 +/- 1
3 on in-phase vs. 33 +/- 14 on out-of-phase). In patients with a nonfatty l
iver, lesion-liver CNR was similar on in-phase and out-of-phase images, pre
dose and postdose. In patients with fatty liver, lesion-liver CNR was signi
ficantly (p < 0.01) lower on out-of-phase images on predose and postdose im
ages.
Conclusion: In-phase GRE imaging is recommended for imaging focal liver les
ions on paramagnetic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with fatty in
filtration of the liver.