Re. Ward et al., Quantitative approach to identifying abnormal variation in the human face exemplified by a study of 278 individuals with five craniofacial syndromes, AM J MED G, 91(1), 2000, pp. 8-17
We have two objectives in this study: to demonstrate the utility of two sum
mary anthropometric measures for quantifying craniofacial variation and to
explore some of their potential uses by physicians and clinical morphologis
ts in general. The Craniofacial Variability Index (CVI) is a summary anthro
pometric measure of facial "harmony.'" The mean z-score, based on craniofac
ial anthropometry, is a measure of overall facial size. Both add an objecti
ve component to the assessment of individual facial variation and allow us
to place the individual along a scale of continuous variation with predeter
mined limits of "normality" based on a reference or control series. Our res
ults suggest that these summary measures coincide well with clinical assess
ments of abnormality in 278 individuals representing five distinct syndrome
s (Brachmann-de Lange, Prader-Willi, Rubinstein-Taybi, Smith-Magenis, and S
otos), each of which has an associated craniofacial component. Although cra
niofacial variation is continuous and the normal and syndromic populations
overlap to varying degrees, the syndromic cases can be characterized in a v
ariety of ways by using CVI as a measure of facial harmony and Mean-Z as an
indicator of overall facial size. Thus, these two-objective measures offer
a novel and efficient means of assessing craniofacial variation, whether t
hey are used as tools in the clinical evaluation of subjects or as a means
of exploring the nature of craniofacial variation within or between syndrom
es. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.