W. Giles et al., The effect of fetal fibronectin testing on admissions to a tertiary maternal-fetal medicine unit and cost savings, AM J OBST G, 182(2), 2000, pp. 439-442
OBJECTIVE: Fetal fibronectin bedside testing has been proposed as a diagnos
tic tool for the accurate diagnosis of preterm labor. The study objective w
as to determine whether the introduction of routine fetal fibronectin bedsi
de testing affected costs and transfer rates from referral district hospita
ls to a tertiary obstetric hospital, as well as direct admissions to a tert
iary referral hospital.
STUDY DESIGN: We performed an 18-month prospective audit of fetal fibronect
in use in 9 referral hospitals and one university maternal-fetal medicine u
nit. Data collected were delivery details and cervical dilatation at admiss
ion. Cost savings in terms of transport costs for patients with a negative
fetal fibronectin result who were not transferred or admitted to the tertia
ry center were calculated for interhospital transfer (road ambulance or fix
ed-wing retrieval).
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients had a presumptive diagnosis of thre
atened preterm labor. Forty-five patients had a positive fetal fibronectin
result and 106 had a negative fetal fibronectin result (3 with cervical dil
atation greater than or equal to 3 cm). Eleven (24%) patients with a positi
ve fetal fibronectin result were delivered within 7 days, and 5 (5%) with a
negative fetal fibronectin result were delivered within 7 days. One patien
t was delivered at 34 weeks, and the remaining patients were delivered at o
r after 36 weeks' gestation. All 3 patients with negative fetal fibronectin
results with cervical dilatation of greater than or equal to 3 cm were del
ivered within 5 days, leaving 2 (1.9%) patients (with closed cervices and n
egative fetal fibronectin results) being delivered 5 days after the fetal f
ibronectin testing. Ninety percent of the patients admitted to a referral h
ospital with threatened preterm labor who had a negative fetal fibronectin
result were not transferred; thus an unnecessary transfer was avoided, with
cost savings ranging from $30,297 for road and fixed-wing transport.
CONCLUSION: A negative fetal fibronectin result is not helpful if cervical
dilatation is present, and these patients should be treated as having a hig
h risk of preterm delivery. The use of a fetal fibronectin test was associa
ted with a 90% reduction in maternal transfer and can substantially reduce
the costs and inconvenience associated with unnecessary transfer.