Of three major theories developed by post-World War II Americans social sci
ence to explain arms races the repeated prisoner's dilemma the spiral model
, and the deterrence model, the deterrence model has recieved the least att
ention from game theorists. I present a amodel of this perspective and disc
uss its implications for arms racing and arms control theory. Arms races ar
ise in the model when there is a conflict of interest between two states an
d uncertainty about the ability of at least one side to bear the strains of
increased military spending. The model provides support for two common ant
iques of arms control. First arms control is difficult to achieve when ther
e is a dispute accompanied by uncertainty that could lead to war. Second ar
ms traces, though they occur in times of tension do not necessarily increas
e the likelihood of war and may even reduce it by reducing uncertainity abo
ut relative power.