This is the story of the remarkable psychologist John E. Coover, who, in th
e early 1900s, was the first to advocate the comparison of experimental and
control ol groups as a methodological necessity. Moreover, the author rais
es the issue of why control groups were launched about a century ago, and w
hy psychology was comparatively early in codifying group comparison as a me
thodological routine. In dealing with these questions, the author discusses
the relations between turn-of-the-century science and society as well as b
etween psychophysical research and educational experimentation, Furthermore
, the mystery is solved of how Coover's rightful place in the received hist
ory of experimental controls could be taken by precisely the authors whom h
e criticized for the lack of controls.