Ga. Nuttall et al., Comparison of blood-conservation strategies in cardiac surgery patients athigh risk for bleeding, ANESTHESIOL, 92(3), 2000, pp. 674-682
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background: Aprotinin and tranexamic acid are routinely used to reduce blee
ding in cardiac surgery. There is a large difference in agent price and per
haps in efficacy.
Methods: in a prospective, randomized, partially blinded study, 168 cardiac
surgery patients at high risk for bleeding received either a full-dose apr
otinin infusion, tranexamic acid (10-mg/kg load, 1.mg.kg(-1).h(-1) infusion
), tranexamic acid with pre-cardiopulmonary bypass autologous whole-blood c
ollection (12.5% blood volume) and reinfusion after cardiopulmonary bypass
(combined therapy), or saline infusion (placebo group).
Results: There were complete data in 160 patients. The aprotinin (n = 40) a
nd combined therapy (n = 32) groups (data are median [range]) had similar r
eductions in blood loss in the first 4 h in the intensive care unit (225 [4
0-761] and 163[25-760] mi, respectively; P = 0.014), erythrocyte transfusio
n requirements in the first 24 h in the intensive care unit (0 [0-3] and 0
[0-3] U, respectively; P = 0.004), and durations of time from end of cardio
pulmonary bypass to discharge from the operating room (92[57-215] and 94 [3
7, 186] min, respectively; P = 0.01) compared with the placebo group (n = 4
3). Ten patients in the combined therapy group (30.3%) required transfusion
of the autologous blood during cardiopulmonary bypass for anemia.
Conclusions: The combination therapy of tranexamic acid and intraoperative
autologous blood collection provided similar reduction in blood loss and tr
ansfusion requirements as aprotinin. Cost analyses revealed that combined t
herapy and tranexamic acid therapy were the least costly therapies.