Re. Jimenez et al., Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis, ANN SURG, 231(3), 2000, pp. 293-300
Objective
To compare the short- and long-term results of pancreaticoduodenectomy with
pylorus preservation (PPPD) or with antrectomy (Whipple procedure) in the
treatment of selected patients with chronic pancreatitis.
Background
PPPD may be preferred over Whipple because of its purported nutritional adv
antages and the reduced likelihood of postgastrectomy syndromes.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of 72 consecutive patients undergoing
pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis between 1991 and 1997.
Results
PPPD was performed in 39 patients and Whipple in 33. The two patient popula
tions had similar characteristics. Short-term complications included (PPPD
vs. Whipple): pancreatic or biliary fistulas (5.1% vs. 15%), delayed gastri
c emptying (33% vs. 12%), cholangitis (2.6% vs. 6.1%), and death (0 vs. 3%)
. Delayed gastric emptying was not associated with other complications and
resulted in longer hospital stays for PPPD than for Whipple patients (15 vs
. 12 days). The duration of follow-up averaged 41 +/- 24 months. Long-term
weight status was similar, with body-mass indices of 22.1 and 22.9 after PP
PD and Whipple, respectively. Postoperative enzyme supplementation (63% vs.
77%) and new-onset diabetes (10% vs. 12%) did not differ significantly bet
ween the PPPD and Whipple groups. Dumping, bile gastritis, or peptic ulcer
disease occurred in three patients after PPPD and in three after Whipple. C
omplete or partial pain relief was attained in 60% and 70% of patients afte
r PPPD and Whipple, respectively Multivariate analysis of preoperative vari
ables revealed that site-specific pathology in the head of the pancreas was
the only independent factor associated with successful pain relief after p
ancreatic resection.
Conclusion
PPPD results in higher frequencies of postoperative delayed gastric emptyin
g compared with the Whipple procedure. Both operations achieve comparable l
ong-term nutritional results, cause new insulin dependence in surprisingly
few patients, and provide equivalent pain relief to 65% of selected patient
s. Patients with disproportionate pathology in the head of the pancreas hav
e a higher likelihood of successful pain relief.