Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis

Citation
Re. Jimenez et al., Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis, ANN SURG, 231(3), 2000, pp. 293-300
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANNALS OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00034932 → ACNP
Volume
231
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
293 - 300
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4932(200003)231:3<293:OOPWPP>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Objective To compare the short- and long-term results of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation (PPPD) or with antrectomy (Whipple procedure) in the treatment of selected patients with chronic pancreatitis. Background PPPD may be preferred over Whipple because of its purported nutritional adv antages and the reduced likelihood of postgastrectomy syndromes. Methods A retrospective review was performed of 72 consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis between 1991 and 1997. Results PPPD was performed in 39 patients and Whipple in 33. The two patient popula tions had similar characteristics. Short-term complications included (PPPD vs. Whipple): pancreatic or biliary fistulas (5.1% vs. 15%), delayed gastri c emptying (33% vs. 12%), cholangitis (2.6% vs. 6.1%), and death (0 vs. 3%) . Delayed gastric emptying was not associated with other complications and resulted in longer hospital stays for PPPD than for Whipple patients (15 vs . 12 days). The duration of follow-up averaged 41 +/- 24 months. Long-term weight status was similar, with body-mass indices of 22.1 and 22.9 after PP PD and Whipple, respectively. Postoperative enzyme supplementation (63% vs. 77%) and new-onset diabetes (10% vs. 12%) did not differ significantly bet ween the PPPD and Whipple groups. Dumping, bile gastritis, or peptic ulcer disease occurred in three patients after PPPD and in three after Whipple. C omplete or partial pain relief was attained in 60% and 70% of patients afte r PPPD and Whipple, respectively Multivariate analysis of preoperative vari ables revealed that site-specific pathology in the head of the pancreas was the only independent factor associated with successful pain relief after p ancreatic resection. Conclusion PPPD results in higher frequencies of postoperative delayed gastric emptyin g compared with the Whipple procedure. Both operations achieve comparable l ong-term nutritional results, cause new insulin dependence in surprisingly few patients, and provide equivalent pain relief to 65% of selected patient s. Patients with disproportionate pathology in the head of the pancreas hav e a higher likelihood of successful pain relief.