Ja. Greenwald et al., Standardization of surgeon-controlled variables - Impact on outcome in patients with acute cholecystitis, ANN SURG, 231(3), 2000, pp. 339-344
Objective
To examine the effect of standardization of surgeon-controlled Variables on
patient outcome after cholecystectomy for two cohorts of patients with acu
te cholecystitis (AC).
Summary Background Data
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), when performed efficiently and safety, o
ffers patients with AC a more rapid recovery and decreases the length of st
ay, thus reducing the health care utilization. Numerous studies have focuse
d on the characteristics of patients with AC that may predict the conversio
n of LC to open cholecystectomy. However, analysis of these factors offers
little insight for improving the outcome of patients with AC, because patie
nt-controlled Variables are difficult to influence. In the present study, t
reatment variables that were under the surgeon's control were standardized
and the effects of these changes on the outcome of patients with AC were qu
antified.
Methods
Beginning in August 1997, a standardized treatment protocol was initiated f
or patients with suspected AC. LC was initiated as early as practical from
the time of admission. All operations were performed in a specially equippe
d and staffed laparoscopic surgery suite, and all patients were supervised
by one of two attending surgeons with a special interest in laparoscopic in
terventions. Two cohorts of patients with AC were retrospectively analyzed:
39 patients from the 12 months betore initiation of this protocol (period
1) and 49 patients from the 12 months after its inception (period 2). Medic
al records were reviewed for demographic, perioperative, and outcome data.
Surgical reports were reviewed to ascertain the reason for conversion and w
hether laparoscopic technical modifications were used.
Results
No significant difference was noted between the groups with regard to patie
nt demographics, clinical presentation, or radiologic or laboratory paramet
ers. After protocol initiation, patients received definitive treatment clos
er to the time of admission and had a greater percentage of laparoscopicall
y completed cholecystectomies. Furthermore, the patients in period 2 had a
significantly decreased postoperative length of stay and hospital charges t
han the earlier ones. Complications were infrequent and not significantly d
ifferent between the groups. Two or more laparoscopic technical medications
were used in 95% of the successful LCs during period 2 versus 33.3% during
period 1.
Conclusions
By controlling when, where, and by whom LC for AC was performed, the author
s have significantly improved the percentage of cholecystectomies that were
completed laparoscopically. This has led to improved outcomes and lower ho
spital charges for patients with AC at this municipal hospital.