Investigation of sampling procedures to determine macadamia fruit quality in orchards

Citation
Nm. Meyers et al., Investigation of sampling procedures to determine macadamia fruit quality in orchards, AUST J EX A, 39(8), 1999, pp. 1007-1012
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE
ISSN journal
08161089 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1007 - 1012
Database
ISI
SICI code
0816-1089(1999)39:8<1007:IOSPTD>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Macadamia kernel quality estimates are of fundamental importance to underst anding tree responses to many experimental treatments and orchard managemen t protocols. Experimental measures of macadamia kernel quality, collected u nder field conditions, traditionally rely on the average of 100 fruit, samp led from the estimated peak in fruit drop. To detect changes in kernel qual ity over a single season, we measured variation in fruit quality of macadam ia cv. 344. To sample this variation we measured 10 fruit from 6 blocks of 3 trees at each of 7 sites, over 4 harvests made at monthly intervals. For all fruit collected we determined: husk, shell and kernel dry weights; kern el recovery (the percentage of kernel to kernel and shell weight); and kern el specific gravity from which oil content was estimated. A split-plot anal ysis of variance model was used to determine variance estimates for each of the fruit quality parameters measured. The percentages of partitioned tota l variance of the quality parameters were lowest for sites (3.6-6.7%), inte rmediate for harvests (3.3-41.1%) and highest for fruit (32.9-71.2%). Using these estimates, we investigated the influence of varying the number of re plicates per site and fruits per replicate on kernel quality estimates. The analyses indicated that samples of 5 fruit, from each of 6 randomly locate d blocks within a site, represent the minimum replication required to detec t commercially relevant changes in the kernel quality parameters measured. Larger sample sizes and increased replication did not significantly increas e the precision of estimates.