K. Ott et al., Does the UICC classification of 1997 show a better prognostic value for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas than the old classification?, CHIRURG, 71(2), 2000, pp. 189-195
Introduction: To compare treatment results an international established cla
ssification is necessary. In 1997 the TNM classification of 1992 was modifi
ed. Methods: Between 1983 and 1997, 159 patients with a ductal carcinoma of
the pancreas underwent resection. All data of the resected specimens were
documented in standardized manner prospectively in a protocol that offered
ready transfer of the collected data to a new classification. The TNM categ
ories and stage groupings were transferred to the new UICC classification o
f 1997 and analyzed in comparison to the classification of 1992. Results: T
he inclusion of a pT4 category equivalent to the other GI tumors made a new
stage grouping necessary. Also division into pN1a and pN1b was established
. According to the clinical experience only few tumors in early stages (pT1
/2 and stage I) were observed in the new classification. There was a signif
icant improval in the patient's distribution to the new stage grouping beca
use of the homogeneous groups. In comparison to the 1992 classification the
new stage II shows a relevant prognostic value and a significant differenc
e to stage III. Conclusion: We conclude that the new UICC classification re
lates to prognosis better than the old classification.