C. Farenc et al., Pharmacokinetics of atracurium and laudanosine in intensive care patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing mechanical ventilation, CLIN DRUG I, 19(2), 2000, pp. 143-150
Objective: To determine the pharmacokinetic profiles of atracurium and its
main metabolite (laudanosine) in patients with acute respiratory distress s
yndrome undergoing mechanical ventilation.
Patients and Methods: Plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of atracurium and lau
danosine were studied in eight critically ill patients with acute respirato
ry distress syndrome who required a neuromuscular blocking drug to assist m
echanical ventilation. Patients received an infusion of atracurium (1 mg/kg
per hour) for 72 hours after an initial intravenous bolus dose of 1 mg/kg.
Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using an accelerograph. Blood samples
were obtained over a 96-hour period. Atracurium and laudanosine concentrat
ions in plasma were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. A
single-compartment pharmacokinetic model was fitted to plasma concentratio
ns of atracurium and laudanosine.
Results: For atracurium, the median elimination half-life value was 20.7 mi
nutes (0.35h); the steady-state volume of distribution ranged from 0.148 to
0.327 L/kg and the total clearance from 0.27 to 0.67 L/h/kg (4.5 to 11 ml/
min/kg). For laudanosine, the elimination half-life ranged from approximate
ly 2 to 21 hours and the maximum plasma concentration ranged from 0.86 to 1
6 mg/L. For all patients, the train-of-four (TOF) count was recorded to 4 a
t baseline. Within 1 hour after the beginning of infusion, 7 of 8 patients
had a TOF count of less than or equal to 1. The neuromuscular recovery rang
ed from 32 to 67 minutes.
Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic properties of atracurium in intensive care
unit patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome are similar to those
in patients during anaesthesia. Moreover, the dosage regimen administered
to the patients in this study (i) provided sufficient neuromuscular blockag
e for adequate ventilation, and (ii) does not require monitoring of neuromu
scular function, a procedure that does not seem to eliminate prolonged weak
ness and myopathy.