As the globalization of society and the economy accelerates, treaties will
come to assume a significant role in the regulation of domestic affairs. Th
is Article considers whether the Constitution, as originally understood, pe
rmits treaties to directly regulate the conduct of private parties without
legislative :implementation. It examines the relationship between the treat
y power and the legislative power during the colonial, revolutionary, Frami
ng, and early national periods to reconstruct the Framers' understandings.
A concludes that the Framers believed that treaties could not exercise dome
stic, legislative power without the consent of Congress, because of the Con
stitution's creation of a national legislature that could independently exe
cute treaty obligations. The Framers also anticipated that Congress's contr
ol over treaty implementation through legislation would constitute an impor
tant check on the executive branch's power in foreign affairs.