Virtual endoscopy - Comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon

Citation
Cl. Kay et al., Virtual endoscopy - Comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon, ENDOSCOPY, 32(3), 2000, pp. 226-232
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
0013726X → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
226 - 232
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-726X(200003)32:3<226:VE-CWC>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Background and Study Aims: A new technique has been described which combine s abdominal helical computed tomography (CT) scanning and virtual reality c omputer technology, known as virtual colonoscopy (VC); the reconstructed im ages provide a simulation of the interior of the colon as viewed by endosco py, We compared VC with conventional colonoscopy in patients with suspected or known colonic neoplasia. Patients and Methods: A total of 38 patients, in whom there was a high like lihood of colonic polyps or cancer, underwent a noncontrast helical CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis after regular colonoscopy bowel preparation,The images were reconstructed into a VC presentation and compared with the subs equent conventional colonoscopy in a blinded manner. Results: Conventional colonoscopy identified a total of 24 polyps 5 mm or g reater. VC correctly identified five of 13 polyps 5-9 mm in size, and ten o f II lesions greater than or equal to 10 mm in diameter. The reasons for fo ur missed lesions were identified as being secondary to a collapsed rectum in two patients and stool in the right colon in two patients, The sensitivi ty and specificity per patient of VC for lesions greater than or equal to 5 mm were 66.7% and 75.0% respectively, and for lesions greater than 1 cm we re 90.0% and 82.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Virtual colonoscopy is feasible, well tolerated, and capable o f detecting most lesions seater than 10 mm in diameter, This technique is c ontinuing to be developed and warrants further evaluation as a diagnostic a nd screening tool in colorectal neoplasia.