In a broad-based study of experiences in psychological research, 65 undergr
aduates participating in a wide range of psychological experiments were int
erviewed in depth. Overall findings demonstrated that participants hold var
ying views, with only 32% of participants characterizing their experiences
as completely positive. Participants' descriptions of their debriefing expe
riences suggest substantial variability in the content, format, and general
quality of debriefing practices. Just over 40% of the debriefing experienc
es were viewed favorably. Positive debriefing experiences were described as
including a thorough explanation of the study and detailed information con
cerning the broader relevance of the experiment to the field of psychology.
The most common complaint, characterizing 28.8% of the responses, was that
the debriefing was unclear and that insufficient information was provided.
Participants' views of psychological research and the discipline of psycho
logy were also elicited. Results are discussed in terms of ethical and meth
odological implications.