A comparison between laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsationand pneumotonometric measurement of pulsatile ocular blood flow 1. Baseline considerations

Citation
L. Schmetterer et al., A comparison between laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsationand pneumotonometric measurement of pulsatile ocular blood flow 1. Baseline considerations, EYE, 14, 2000, pp. 39-45
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
EYE
ISSN journal
0950222X → ACNP
Volume
14
Year of publication
2000
Part
1
Pages
39 - 45
Database
ISI
SICI code
0950-222X(200002)14:<39:ACBLIM>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Purpose Several methods have been proposed for the investigation of the hum an choroidal circulation. The aim of the present study was to compare laser interferometric measurements of cardiac synchronous fundus pulsations with pneumotonometric measurements of intraocular pressure pulse and pulsatile ocular blood flow in humans. Methods The association between fundus pulsation amplitude as assessed with laser interferometry and pulse amplitude (PA) and pulsatile ocular blood f low (POBF) as assessed with pneumotonometry was investigated in 28 healthy subjects. Additionally, we investigated the distribution of fundus pulsatio n amplitude (FPA) in a region of -15 degrees to +15 degrees around the macu la (n = 18) and the influence of accommodation paralysis with cyclopentolat e on FPA (n = 10). Results There was a high association between FPA and PA (r = 0.86, p < 0.00 1) and FPA and POBF (r = 0.70, p < 0.001). Fundus pulsations in the macula were significantly smaller than in the optic disc, but significantly larger than those in peripheral regions of the retina. Administration of cyclopen tolate did not influence FPA. Conclusions On the basis of the strong correlation between laser interferom etric measurements of FPA and pneumotonometric measurements of PA and POBF, we conclude that the FPA is a valid index of pulsatile choroidal perfusion in humans.