A comparison between laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsationand pneumotonometric measurement of pulsatile ocular blood flow 1. Baseline considerations
L. Schmetterer et al., A comparison between laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsationand pneumotonometric measurement of pulsatile ocular blood flow 1. Baseline considerations, EYE, 14, 2000, pp. 39-45
Purpose Several methods have been proposed for the investigation of the hum
an choroidal circulation. The aim of the present study was to compare laser
interferometric measurements of cardiac synchronous fundus pulsations with
pneumotonometric measurements of intraocular pressure pulse and pulsatile
ocular blood flow in humans.
Methods The association between fundus pulsation amplitude as assessed with
laser interferometry and pulse amplitude (PA) and pulsatile ocular blood f
low (POBF) as assessed with pneumotonometry was investigated in 28 healthy
subjects. Additionally, we investigated the distribution of fundus pulsatio
n amplitude (FPA) in a region of -15 degrees to +15 degrees around the macu
la (n = 18) and the influence of accommodation paralysis with cyclopentolat
e on FPA (n = 10).
Results There was a high association between FPA and PA (r = 0.86, p < 0.00
1) and FPA and POBF (r = 0.70, p < 0.001). Fundus pulsations in the macula
were significantly smaller than in the optic disc, but significantly larger
than those in peripheral regions of the retina. Administration of cyclopen
tolate did not influence FPA.
Conclusions On the basis of the strong correlation between laser interferom
etric measurements of FPA and pneumotonometric measurements of PA and POBF,
we conclude that the FPA is a valid index of pulsatile choroidal perfusion
in humans.