Influence of postal distribution of The Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial

Citation
S. Kerry et al., Influence of postal distribution of The Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial, FAM PRACT, 17(1), 2000, pp. 46-52
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
FAMILY PRACTICE
ISSN journal
02632136 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
46 - 52
Database
ISI
SICI code
0263-2136(200002)17:1<46:IOPDOT>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Background. The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) have produced regularly updated guidelines on radiological referrals since 1990. A small study in 1992 showed postal distribution of guidelines reduced general practitioners ' referrals over the subsequent 9 weeks. However there have been no randomi zed trials of the longer term effects of radiological guidelines and feedba ck on referral rates on X-ray requests from primary care. Objectives. To see if the introduction of radiological guidelines into gene ral practices together with feedback on referral rates reduces the number o f GP radiological requests over one year; and to explore GPs' attitudes to the guidelines. Methods. Sixty-nine practices referring patients to St George's Healthcare Trust were randomly allocated to intervention or control groups. In Februar y 1995 a GP version of the RCR guidelines was sent to each GP in the 33 pra ctices in the intervention group. After 9 months intervention, practices we re sent revised guidelines with individual feedback on the number of examin ations requested in the past 6 months. The total number of requests per pra ctice was compared for the year before and the year after the introduction of the guidelines. Control practices were sent the guidelines at the end of the study. All doctors were sent a questionnaire about the guidelines. Results. A total of 43 778 radiological requests were made during the two y ears 1994-1996. In practices receiving the guidelines there was a 20% reduc tion in requests for spinal examinations compared with control practices (P < 0.05). This corresponded to the effect reported by GPs. There was also a 10% difference between the groups in the total number of requests made, bu t due to wide interpractice variation in referral rates this failed to reac h statistical significance. Conclusions. Introduction of radiological guidelines together with feedback on referral rates was effective in reducing the number of requests for spi nal examinations over one year. Wider use of GP-orientated guidelines with regular updating and feedback might save costs and reduce unnecessary irrad iation of patients.