Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations
M. Amer et al., Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations, HUM REPR, 15(3), 2000, pp. 653-656
The value of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) by microdissection was eval
uated according to its physiological consequences compared with open, class
ic surgical biopsy in the same patient. A total of 100 patients with nonobs
tructive azoospermia and bilateral identical testicular histology underwent
bilateral diagnostic TESE via the conventional method on one side and the
microsurgical method on the other side. The spermatozoa recovery rate by mi
crodissection TESE was significantly higher than by conventional TESE (47 a
nd 30% respectively; P < 0.05). In order to assess the safety of this new p
rocedure, 60 patients were followed-up ultrasonographically for 1, 3 and 6
months. Acute and chronic complications were significantly lower in the mic
rosurgical side compared with the conventional side (15 and 58.3% respectiv
ely and 3 and 30% respectively; P < 0.05). Segmental devascularization was
detected in seven testes operated on conventionally, and in two testes oper
ated on microsurgically, However, permanent devascularization could not be
detected in any patient after 6 months. These findings suggest that microdi
ssection TESE is not devoid of complications, but that it is relatively saf
er than the conventional technique and improves sperm yield significantly i
n patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.