Sperm chromatin packaging as an indicator of in-vitro fertilization rates

Citation
Ad. Esterhuizen et al., Sperm chromatin packaging as an indicator of in-vitro fertilization rates, HUM REPR, 15(3), 2000, pp. 657-661
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
HUMAN REPRODUCTION
ISSN journal
02681161 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
657 - 661
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1161(200003)15:3<657:SCPAAI>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The development of a sequential diagnostic schedule for patients consulting for infertility disturbances would be an ideal method of approach for clin icians in the absence of an aetiological or pathophysiological diagnosis. S ince sperm morphology recorded by strict criteria has often been correlated with fertilization failure, the present study aimed to evaluate the relati onship between normal morphology as well as in-vitro fertilization (IVF) ra tes, with chromatin staining among fertile and subfertile men. Two semen sm ears were prepared from each specimen obtained from 72 men to record normal morphology and chromatin packaging as recorded by chromomycin A(3) (CMA(3) ) staining. Following the semen analyses, the 72 men were divided into the two morphological groups, namely <4% and >4% normal forms. Significantly di fferent percentages of CMA(3) staining (mean SE) were recorded between the two morphological groups, namely 65.9% +/- 3.5 and 44.5% +/- 1.7 (P +/- 0.0 01). A highly negative significant correlation existed between percentage o f normal morphology as recorded by strict criteria and CMA3 staining, A hig hly significant and positive correlation was recorded for normal morphology and IVF rates (r +/- 0.45, P +/- 0.0001). A significant negative correlati on (r +/- -0.51, P +/- 0.0001) existed between CMA3 values and IVF rates. T he discriminating power of nuclear maturity, as recorded by CMA3 staining, to identify abnormal morphology values and poor IVF rates was calculated wi th receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.86 for sperm morphology and 0.74 for IVF rates. The calculat ed threshold values for CMA3 staining to distinguish between morphology gro ups were 48 and 50% for IVF. Chromatin packaging assessment is a valuable a ddition to the sequential diagnostic programme in an assisted reproductive arena.