Validation of bio-impedance spectroscopy: Effects of degree of obesity andways of calculating volumes from measured resistance values

Citation
Pl. Cox-reijven et Pb. Soeters, Validation of bio-impedance spectroscopy: Effects of degree of obesity andways of calculating volumes from measured resistance values, INT J OBES, 24(3), 2000, pp. 271-280
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
ISSN journal
03070565 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
271 - 280
Database
ISI
SICI code
0307-0565(200003)24:3<271:VOBSEO>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical-impedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a very attractive method for body composition measurements in a clinical setting. However, v alidation studies often yield different results. This can partly be explain ed by the different approaches used to transform measured resistance values into body compartments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the linear regression (LR) method with the Hanai Mixture theory (HM). Secondly, the effect of degree o f overweight on the accuracy of BIS was analysed. DESIGN: In 90 people (10 M, 80 F; body mass index (BMI) 23 - 62 kg/m(2)) to tal body water (TBW) and extracellular water (ECW) were measured by deuteri um and NaBr dilution methods, respectively, and by BIS. Resistance values o f ECW (R-ECW) and TBW (R-TBW) were used for volume calculations. Data of ha lf the group were used for LR based on L-2/R (L = length, R = resistance) t o predict TBW and ECW and to calculate the constants used in the HM (k(ECW) ), k(p)) Prediction equations and constants were cross-validated in Group 2 . RESULTS: Bland and Altman analysis showed that the LR method underestimated TBW by 1.1 I (P < 0.005) and ECW by 1.11 (P < 0,005). The HM approach unde restimated ECW by 0.81 (P < 0,005), The correlations with the dilution meth ods and the SEEs for TBW and ECW were comparable for the two approaches. Th e prediction error of BIS for TBW and ECW correlated with BMI. The constant kECW, and the specific resistivities of the ECW and intracellular water (I CW) P-ICW and P-ICW were also correlated with BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The mixture approach is slightly more accurate than linear reg ression, but not sensitive enough for clinical use. The constants used in t he HM model are not constants in a population with a wide variation in degr ee of overweight. The physical causes of the correlation between BMI and co nstants used in the model should be studied further in order to optimize th e mixture model.