The selection problem has been studied extensively on sequential machines.
A linear average time solution and a linear worst-case solution are conside
red as the standard by most researchers. Theoretical work is also available
on parallel models, but it has not been widely implemented on parallel mac
hines. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of the implementation of th
e standard algorithms, on a number of multiprocessors and supercomputers fr
om the entire spectrum of Flynn's classification, using both an imperative
(C based languages with vendor specific parallel extensions) and a function
al (SISAL) language. Very interesting results were obtained for all of the
experiments performed, leading us to the conclusion that the selection prob
lem has very efficient parallel implementations. Hand-tuned C programs with
parallel extensions provided good efficiency but were time-consuming in te
rms of development. On the other hand, the SISAL code is fully portable and
the same program a;as used on all the machines. The performances of SISAL
implementations were comparable to the ones of the hand-tuned C implementat
ions. On all the tests, the routines were able to sustain good speed-up and
reasonable efficiency, even with ii large number of processors, In two cas
es (one machine using SISAL, and one using a C-based language); we were abl
e to obtain an efficiency higher than 80% with a configuration close or equ
al to the maximum number of processors.