This paper tests 2 theories of relevance to design review and design guidel
ines. In Study I, a between-subjects design, 111 college students in Connec
ticut and 93 college students in Ohio judged goodness of example, familiari
ty, or preference for 6 houses. The results failed to uncover differences i
n response related to local experience, suggesting that global features of
the houses may overcome local experience. In Study 2, a within-subjects des
ign, 110 students from Connecticut and 49 from Ohio rated goodness of examp
le, familiarity, and preference for the same 6 houses. Results indicate min
or effects of goodness of example and familiarity on preference. The result
s show preference as multidimensional, reflecting knowledge structure, phys
ical features, and connotative meanings.