Cm. Hamilton et al., TraG from RP4 and TraG and VirD4 from Ti plasmids confer relaxosome specificity to the conjugal transfer system of pTiC58, J BACT, 182(6), 2000, pp. 1541-1548
Plasmid conjugation systems are composed of two components, the DNA transfe
r and replication system, or Dtr, and the mating pair formation system, or
Mpf. During conjugal transfer an essential factor, called the coupling prot
ein, is thought to interface the Dtr, in the form of the relaxosome, with t
he Mpf, in the form of the mating bridge. These proteins, such as TraG from
the IncP1 plasmid RP4 (TraG(RP4)) and TraG and VirD4 from the conjugal tra
nsfer and T-DNA transfer systems of Ti plasmids, are believed to dictate sp
ecificity of the interactions that can occur between different Dtr and Mpf
components. The Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens do not mobilize ve
ctors containing the oriT of RP4, but these IncP1 plasmid derivatives lack
the trans-acting Dtr functions and TraG(RP4). A. tumefaciens donors transfe
rred a chimeric plasmid that contains the oriT and Dtr genes of RP4 and the
Mpf genes of pTiC58, indicating that the Ti plasmid mating bridge can inte
ract with the RP4 relaxosome. However, the Ti plasmid did not mobilize tran
sfer from an IncQ relaxosome. The Ti plasmid did mobilize such plasmids if
TraG(RP4) was expressed in the donors. Mutations in traG(RP4) with defined
effects on the RP4 transfer system exhibited similar phenotypes for Ti plas
mid-mediated mobilization of the IncQ vector. When provided with VirD4, the
tra system of pTiC58 mobilized plasmids from the IncQ relaxosome. However,
neither TraG(RP4) nor VirD4 restored transfer to a traG mutant of the Ti p
lasmid. VirD4 also failed to complement a traG(RP4) mutant for transfer fro
m the RP4 relaxosome or for RP4-mediated mobilization from the IncQ relaxos
ome. TraG(RP4)-mediated mobilization of the IncQ plasmid by pTiC58 did not
inhibit Ti plasmid transfer, suggesting that the relaxosomes of the two pla
smids do not compete for the same mating bridge. We conclude that TraG(RP4)
and VirD4 couples the IncQ but not the Ti plasmid relaxosome to the Ti pla
smid mating bridge. However, VirD4 cannot couple the IncP1 or the IncQ rela
xosome to the RP4 mating bridge. These results support a model in which the
coupling proteins specify the interactions between Dtr and Mpf components
of mating systems.