In March 1997, the Supreme Court upheld the must-carry provisions of the 19
92 Cable Act on the grounds that they insured the survival of the "free" ov
er-the-air television. This article empirically evaluates the efficacy of m
ust-carry in preserving free television and shows that non-network broadcas
t stations were able to increase viewer share after must-carry, lending sup
port to the preservation rationale. The empirical analysis also indicates t
hat this increase came exclusively from network stations, not cable program
ming.