Mucogingival interceptive surgery of buccally-erupted premolars in patients scheduled for orthodontic treatment. II. Surgically treated versus nonsurgically treated cases
Gp. Prato et al., Mucogingival interceptive surgery of buccally-erupted premolars in patients scheduled for orthodontic treatment. II. Surgically treated versus nonsurgically treated cases, J PERIODONT, 71(2), 2000, pp. 182-187
Background: The aim of this 2-year longitudinal study was to compare the wi
dth of keratinized gingiva after orthodontic therapy for buccally erupting
premolars that had been pretreated by extraction of deciduous teeth alone v
ersus interceptive mucogingival surgery.
Methods: In 8 patients (aged 9 to 12 years) who presented with bilateral bu
ccal eruption of homologous teeth (premolars), one side was randomly treate
d with extraction of the deciduous molar and mucogingival surgery (test sit
e), while the other side was treated only by extraction of the deciduous mo
lar (control site). All of the subjects underwent orthodontic treatment wit
h fixed appliances.
Results: At the baseline visit prior to any treatment, there was no signifi
cant difference between the mean amount of keratinized gingiva at test site
s (3.06 mm) and control sites (2.93 mm). Two years later, upon completion o
f orthodontic treatment, there was a significant difference between test (2
.93 mm) and control (1.37 mm) sites in the mean width of keratinized tissue
. In the control (untreated) group, 2 sites exhibited 1 mm of gingival rece
ssion after orthodontic treatment.
Conclusions: Mucogingival interceptive surgery is an effective technique to
maintain keratinized tissue in correspondence with buccally-erupted teeth.