Tissue response to titanium implants in the rat maxilla: Ultrastructural and histochemical observations of the bone-titanium interface

Citation
T. Futami et al., Tissue response to titanium implants in the rat maxilla: Ultrastructural and histochemical observations of the bone-titanium interface, J PERIODONT, 71(2), 2000, pp. 287-298
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
ISSN journal
00223492 → ACNP
Volume
71
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
287 - 298
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3492(200002)71:2<287:TRTTII>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Background: The detailed mechanism of osseointegration, the most appropriat e implant-bone interface, remains unclear in jaw tissues at the ultrastruct ural level in contrast to the many reports using long bones. The present st udy reports on tissue response to titanium-implantation on an animal model using rat maxilla. Methods: Animals were sacrificed at 1 to 28 days postimplantation and prepa red tissue specimens, freed from implants by a cryofracture technique, were processed for transmission electron microscopy and histochemistry for tart rate resistant acid phosphatase activity (TRAPase). Results: Different patterns in bone formation were recognized between later al and base areas of implant cavities. In the lateral area with narrow gaps , bone deposition took place from the pre-existing bone towards the implant after active bone resorption by osteoclasts reactive to TRAPase. However, no distinct bone formation appeared in the lateral area where the implant h ad been installed close to the osteotomy margin. On the other hand, new bon e formation was found at the base area without any apparent bone resorption . Interestingly, mononuclear cells reactive to TRAPase, presumably preosteo blasts, frequently occurred near preosteoblasts. Osseointegration around th e implants was obtained in this model by 28 days post-implantation except f or the lateral area with complete contact with implants, where the thin lay er remained in contact with the implant surface. Conclusions: These findings indicate that ossification proceeds at differen t modes around the titanium implant in rat maxilla, depending on the nature of the recipient bones and the dimension of the gap between the implant an d osteotomy margin.