Involvement of differential efficiency of transcription by E sigma(s) and E sigma(70) RNA polymerase holoenzymes in growth phase regulation of the Escherichia coli osmE promoter
P. Bordes et al., Involvement of differential efficiency of transcription by E sigma(s) and E sigma(70) RNA polymerase holoenzymes in growth phase regulation of the Escherichia coli osmE promoter, MOL MICROB, 35(4), 2000, pp. 845-853
Transcription of the gene osmE of Escherichia coli is inducible by elevated
osmotic pressure and during the decelerating phase of growth. osmE express
ion is directed by a single promoter, osmE(p). Decelerating phase induction
of osmE(p) is dependent on the sigma(s) (RpoS) factor, whereas its osmotic
induction is independent of sigma(s.) Purified E sigma(s) and E sigma(70)
were both able to transcribe osmE(p) in vitro on supercoiled templates. In
the presence of rpoD800, a mutation resulting in a thermosensitive sigma(70
) factor, a shift to non-permissive temperature abolished induction of osmE
(p) after an osmotic shock during exponential phase, but did not affect the
decelerating phase induction. Point mutations affecting osmE(p) activity w
ere isolated. Down-promoter mutations decreased transcription in both the p
resence and the absence of sigma(s), indicating that the two forms of RNA p
olymerase holoenzyme recognize very similar sequence determinants on the os
mE promoter. Three up-promoter mutations brought osmE(p) closer to the cons
ensus of E sigma(70)-dependent promoters. The two variant promoters exhibit
ing the highest efficiency became essentially independent of sigma(s) in vi
vo. Our data suggest that E sigma(s) transcribes wild-type osmE(p) with a h
igher efficiency than E sigma(70.) A model in which an intrinsic differenti
al recognition contributes to growth phase-dependent regulation is proposed
. Generalization of this model to other sigma(s)-dependent promoters is dis
cussed.