V. Nickeleit et al., BK-virus nephropathy in renal transplants - tubular necrosis, MHC-class IIexpression and rejection in a puzzling game, NEPH DIAL T, 15(3), 2000, pp. 324-332
We review BK-virus nephropathy (BKN) as a new complication that increasingl
y affects renal allografts and causes dysfunction. Since starting in 1996,
we have seen 11 cases. Currently, the prevalence of BKN is 3% in our graft
biopsies. The diagnosis can only be made histologically. The virus affects
tubular epithelial cells that show characteristic intranuclear inclusion bo
dies. The major reason for impaired graft function and a possible way for v
iral particles to gain access to the blood via peritubular capillaries is n
ecrosis of infected epithelial cells. BK-virus DNA in the plasma, which can
be detected by PCR, is closely associated with nephropathy. BK-virus does
not stimulate tubular MHC-class II expression as judged by immunofluorescen
ce double labelling. The inflammatory response is inconsistent and the freq
uency of rejection episodes is not increased during disease. Clinical manif
estation of viral nephropathy evolves in several stages. (i) Initial, asymp
tomatic and reversible activation of the virus, judged by the presence of i
nclusion bearing cells in the urine. (ii) High dose immunosuppressive drug
regimens, often including tacrolimus. (iii) Tubular injury and viraemia as
additional promoting conditions. BKN nephropathy was associated with graft
loss in 45% of our patients. The remaining patients with persistent viral n
ephropathy showed renal dysfunction (serum creatinine levels on average 150
% above baseline readings). Currently, no established antiviral therapy is
available. We discuss attempts to lower immunosuppression as a means to con
trol viral replication. We propose a diagnostic algorithm for screening and
monitoring the disease.