A retrospective study on perfusion incidents and safety devices

Citation
Bl. Mejak et al., A retrospective study on perfusion incidents and safety devices, PERFUSION-U, 15(1), 2000, pp. 51-61
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
PERFUSION-UK
ISSN journal
02676591 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
51 - 61
Database
ISI
SICI code
0267-6591(200001)15:1<51:ARSOPI>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Despite the acceptance of extracorporeal circulation as an effective modali ty to facilitate cardiac surgery patient outcomes can be negatively influen ced by the occurrence of perfusion incidents. A perfusion survey was conduc ted to identify safety techniques and incidents related to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). An 80-question survey was mailed to chief perfusionists of ail 1030 USA car diac surgical centers using CPB. The survey was designed to examine practic es and incidents that occurred during a 2-year period (July 1996 to July 19 98). Five-hundred-and-fifty-two (54% response rate) surveys were returned, which accounted for 797 hospitals (79% of all cardiac centers) and 653 621 surgical procedures. Of the 27 identified CPB safety devices, the highest u tilization was arterial line filters (98.5%) and the lowest arterial line b ubble traps (3.4%). Of the reported cases, a CPB incident occurred once eve ry 138 cases. The most common occurring incidents were protamine reactions( 1:783), coagulation problems (1:771), and heater/cooler failures (1.1809). The rate of occurrence of an incident resulting in a serious injury or deat h was one for every 1453 procedures. Although techniques and safety devices create a relatively secure environme nt for CPB, lower incident rates may be achieved with further improvements in coagulation monitoring and incident reporting.