Calculation of past dead carbon proportion and variability by the comparison of AMS(14)C and TIMS U/Th ages on two holocene stalagmites

Citation
D. Genty et al., Calculation of past dead carbon proportion and variability by the comparison of AMS(14)C and TIMS U/Th ages on two holocene stalagmites, RADIOCARBON, 41(3), 1999, pp. 251-270
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
RADIOCARBON
ISSN journal
00338222 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
251 - 270
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-8222(1999)41:3<251:COPDCP>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Twenty-two radiocarbon activity measurements were made by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) on 2 Holocene stalagmites from Belgium (Han-stm1b) and f rom southwest France (Vil-stm1b). Sixteen thermal ionization mass spectrome tric (TIMS) U/Th measurements were performed parallel to AMS analyses. The past dead carbon proportion (dcp) due to limestone dissolution and old soil organic matter (SOM) degradation is calculated with U/Th ages, measured ca lcite C-14 activity and atmospheric C-14 activity from the dendrochronologi cal calibration curves. Results show that the dcp is different for the 2 st alagmites: between 10,800 and 4780 yr from present dcp=17.5% (sigma=2.4; n= 10) for Han-stm1b and dcp=9.4% (sigma=1.6; n=6) between 3070 and 520 yr for Vil-stm1b. Despite a broad stability of the dcp during the time ranges cov ered by each sample, a slight dcp increase of about 5.0% is observed in the Han-stm1b sample between 8500 and 5200 yr. This change is synchronous with a calcite delta(13)C increase, which could be due to variation in limeston e dissolution processes possibly linked with a vegetation change. The dcp a nd delta(13)C of the 2 studied samples are compared with 5 other modem stal agmites from Europe. Results show that several factors intervene, among the m: the vegetation type. and the soil saturation leading to variable dissolu tion process systems (open/closed). The good correlation (R-2=0.98) between the U/Th ages and the calibrated C-14 ages corrected with a constant dcp v alidates the C-14 method. However, the dcp error leads to large C-14 age er rors (i.e. 250-500 yr for the period studied), which is an obstacle for bot h a high-resolution chronology and the improvement of the C-14 calibration curves, at least for the Holocene.