J. De Jonge et al., Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee wellbeing: a large-scale cross-sectional study, SOCIAL SC M, 50(9), 2000, pp. 1317-1327
This study investigated the affects of the Job Demand-Control (JD-C) Model
and the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) Model on employee well-being. A cross
-sectional survey was conducted comprising a large representative sample of
11,636 employed Dutch men and women. Logistic regression analyses were use
d.
Controlling for job sector, demographic characteristics (including educatio
nal level) and managerial position, employees reporting high job demands (i
.e. psychological and physical demands) and low job control had elevated ri
sks of emotional exhaustion, psychosomatic and physical health complaints a
nd job dissatisfaction (odds ratios ranged from 2.89 to 10.94). Odds ratios
were generally higher in employees reporting both high (psychological and
physical) efforts and low rewards (i.e. poor salary, job insecurity and low
work support): they ranged from 3.23 to 15.43. Furthermore, overcommitted
people had higher risks of poor well-being due to a high effort - low rewar
d mismatch (ORs: 3.57-20.81) than their less committed counterparts (ORs: 3
.01-12.71). Finally, high efforts and low occupational rewards were stronge
r predictors of poor well-being than low job control when both job stress m
odels were simultaneously adjusted.
In conclusion, our findings show independent cumulative effects of both the
JD-C Model and the ERI Model on employee well-being and are not significan
tly different in men and women as well as in young and old people. In parti
cular, high (psychological and physical) efforts and low rewards adversely
affected employee well-being. Preliminary findings also indicate excess ris
ks of poor well-being in overcommitted persons suffering from high cost - l
ow gain conditions at work. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reser
ved.