F. Feuillat et al., A NEW ATTEMPT AT DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN QUERCUS-PETRAEA AND QUERCUS-ROBUR BASED ON WOOD ANATOMY, Canadian journal of forest research, 27(3), 1997, pp. 343-351
The interspecific variability of wood anatomy between the two major oa
k species Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. is still
largely unknown. However, anatomy strongly influences the technologic
al properties of wood and the ecophysiological functioning of trees. M
oreover, identification of oak wood species is a long-standing challen
ge and important for many purposes. In the Citeaux Forest (Burgundy),
58 oaks from 14 mixed stands were sampled for wood anatomy characteriz
ation. image analyses of four ring radiographies per tree were carried
out. Shape, size, and proportion of tissues (earlywood vessels, fiber
, parenchyma, and latewood vessels) were characterized, taking into ac
count cambial age and ring-width effects. Taxonomic status of the tree
s was assessed by foliar morphology analysis. Significant differences
in numerous anatomical features appeared between the two species. The
surface proportion of earlywood vessels (the proportion of total ring
surface area taken up by these vessels), the number of earlywood vesse
ls, and the size and surface proportion of fiber zones were among the
largest. The diameter and shape of earlywood vessels did not differ be
tween the two species. A bivariate discriminant function reached a 78%
rate of success for species recognition. However, a much clearer foli
ar morphology gap existed between the two species. At the intraspecifi
c level, linear correlations between anatomical and morphological vari
ables were significant for a few variables only. Nevertheless, for eac
h species, trees displaying an atypical wood anatomy were also less mo
rphologically representative. Technological and ecophysiological impli
cations of these results are discussed. In mixed stands, hybridization
introgression between the two species could explain the large anatomi
cal overlap. Thus, anatomical discrimination between the two oak speci
es may be easier in pure stands. Finally, a practical identification k
ey is given.