J. Dighton et al., THE ROLE OF ABIOTIC FACTORS, CULTIVATION PRACTICES AND SOIL FAUNA IN THE DISPERSAL OF GENETICALLY-MODIFIED MICROORGANISMS IN SOILS, Agriculture, ecosystems & environment. Applied soil ecology, 5(2), 1997, pp. 109-131
Any study of the fate of genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs), r
eleased into the environment, must examine how far they can disperse f
rom their release site, The likelihood of dispersal will depend on two
key factors: 1.. Speed and distance of dispersal. 2.. Survival and/or
reproduction, enabling them to reach new environments or hosts in a v
iable state. This paper reviews factors influencing the speed and dist
ance of dispersal of soil microbes, These will depend on soil manageme
nt practices, soil physico-chemical properties, and on the activities
and movement of members of the soil biota acting as vectors. Models of
viral and bacterial dispersal are evaluated. Their limited relevance
to natural soils, with their inherent heterogeneity, and applicability
to actinomycete and fungal dispersal is discussed. Cultivation practi
ces cause physical disturbance of the soil by ploughing, tyning and ho
eing. The movement of soil during these activities can disperse microo
rganisms within 20-30 cm of the plough depth and several metres horizo
ntally. Ploughing and tyning increase porosity, but heavy traffic comp
acts the soil and destroys macropores. The former thus aid dispersal a
nd the latter retards it. Plant roots can act as food for microorganis
ms, and their growth will disperse the microorganisms deeper into the
soil. Dispersal may be further increased as root death creates new mac
ropores, As dispersal models have been mainly developed from studies o
f homogenised soils, many of these factors have not been adequately in
corporated in predictions of microbial dispersal. Their are few studie
s directly pertaining to faunal movement of GMMs. This review highligh
ts our current knowledge in identifying potential key faunal groups wh
ich may be influential in enhancing GMM transport in soil, The soil fa
unal community present a range of species diversity and function. The
potential importance of the major soil faunal groups in dispersal of m
icroorganisms is discussed. Larger, mobile animals, such as lumbricids
are the main agents of vertical and horizontal dispersal of GMMs. Lar
ge epigeic fauna such as diplcpods and isopods may be important in hor
izontal dispersal at the soil surface but information on their abundan
ce in different ecosystems is limited. Geographic distribution of faun
al groups influences their importance at any one location. Generally,
the more numerically abundant, but smaller-sized protozoa and nematode
s play an insignificant part. The dispersal of microorganisms by soil
fauna may be of greater importance than abiotic factors in soils of hi
gh clay content or impeded drainage. Models based on artificial microc
osms have shown the importance of soil particle size in downward movem
ent of the drainage water which will carry the microbial propagules. T
his review highlights two major areas where our understanding of inter
actions of soil structure, biotic components and microbial dispersal i
s lacking. Firstly, soil heterogeneity is not included as a factor in
model systems of abiotic dispersal of microbes. This is a major drawba
ck for their use as predictive toots in natural field soils. Secondly,
our lack of knowledge of the interactions between many soil faunal ta
xa and the microbial community requires further attention. We recommen
d that further studies should be conducted in intact systems (natural,
undisturbed sites or intact soil cores) to improve the predictive pow
er of models of movement of microorganisms in soil. (C) 1997 Elsevier
Science B.V.