Identification of alpha 3, alpha 4, and alpha 5 chains of type IV collagenas alloantigens for Alport posttransplant anti-glomerular basement membrane antibodies
R. Kalluri et al., Identification of alpha 3, alpha 4, and alpha 5 chains of type IV collagenas alloantigens for Alport posttransplant anti-glomerular basement membrane antibodies, TRANSPLANT, 69(4), 2000, pp. 679-683
Background. Alport syndrome is a hereditary disorder of basement membranes
especially affecting the kidneys, ears, and eyes. Some patients who undergo
renal transplantation lose their kidneys as a result of posttransplant ant
i-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GEM) disease.
Methods. In the present study, we analyzed serum from 21 unselected Alport
patients who underwent renal transplantation. Eleven samples were from pati
ents without posttransplant anti-GEM nephritis, and 10 were from patients w
ith this disease.
Results. Thirteen serum samples [10 alport posttransplant nephritis serum (
APTN) and three alport posttransplant serum (APT)] revealed linear binding
to the GEM by indirect immunofluorescence, By using direct ELISA and immuno
blotting with GEM constituents and type IV collagen NC1 domains from bovine
, human, and recombinant sources, we detected anti-GBM antibodies in all Al
port patients in varying titers, Five samples showed specific reactivity to
the alpha 3 chain, four to the alpha 5 chain, six to both alpha 3 and alph
a 5 chains, one to the alpha 3 and alpha 4 chains, and two to the alpha 3,
alpha 4, and alpha 5 chains of type IV collagen. The varied spectrum of rea
ctivities was present equally in nephritic and non-nephritic sera, Ten cont
rol samples from non-Alport transplant patients did not exhibit specific bi
nding to the GEM.
Conclusions. These results suggest that the absence of alpha 3, alpha 4, an
d alpha 5 chains of type TV collagen in the Alport kidney leads to alloanti
bodies in all Alport patients who receive transplants, irrespective of whet
her they develop nephritis or not, Although all Alport transplant patients
develop this humoral response, only a select few develop anti-GEM disease,
We suggest that this difference could be attributable to a genotypic effect
on the ability of some individuals to launch a cell-mediated immune respon
se.